Bill Moyers Journal: Interview with Wendell Potter

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

One of the most convincing things in the film in question is Wendell Potters emotional condition when he speaks about the case of Nataline Sarkisyan. The teenager died in 2007 because of bureaucratic hurdles and the inability to get the required liver transplant (Diego). That year, Potter was the representative of the organization that rejected the patients request for coverage (Diego). In Bill Moyerss interview, he seems to understand the public impact of such cases and tries to explain the roots of similar problems without being disrespectful toward the teenagers family.

The thing that I do not find convincing is Potters answers peculiar to his opinion on inequality in healthcare when he was working for Cigna. He claims that he was constantly distracted from the actual problems of patients who could not access treatment and, therefore, did not notice issues with healthcare provision (Diego). To me, it does not sound persuasive since people in high positions usually have access to any information that they need.

The first virtue relevant to the film is fairness or the willingness to prefer actions that are required and morally right. For instance, Potter had to demonstrate it after confirming his worst suspicions concerning peoples access to care offered by Cigna (Diego). The next virtue relevant to the situations from the film is honesty  the neglect of this value was strongly interconnected with propaganda. According to Potters confession, the healthcare industry in the United States used scare tactics and the misrepresentation of information to impact common citizens opinions on medical care (Diego).

An example of a moral dilemma is Potters difficult decision to tell about the results of his investigations and face risks related to further career development. He had to choose between two options: tell the truth and face his uncertain future or stay neutral and live with a sense of guilt (Diego). He chose the first alternative and managed to benefit from the situation and become a popular author.

Work Cited

Diego, Ken, director. The Bill Moyers Journal. Public Affairs Television, Inc., 2009. Web.

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now